Ottawa Divorce .com Forums


User CP

New posts

Advertising

  Ottawa Divorce .com Forums > Main Category > Divorce & Family Law > Common Law Issues

Common Law Issues The law regarding common law relationships is different than in cases of divorce. Discuss the issues that affect unmarried couples here.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2006, 09:41 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 3
lookingforadvise is on a distinguished road
Default common law break up with kids of previous marriage

Looking for some help. I've been in a common law relationship with a woman for 5 yrs. She has 2 kids from a previous marriage. Trying to figure out if I should be/will be forced to pay child support. Altough we have all been living in my house as a family there are some things about the support issues I'm not sure of. Her daughter has never really accepted me and I don't think that anyone would ever say that we had a father/daughter relationship. her son and I were closer but he has always called me by my first name and will talk to me about his "dad" who is still active in their life when possible. I see our relationship as more uncle/nephew or big brother like, but I'm not sure how the courts view it? My ex currently receives $600.00 a month for child support - apparently she settled for less than was to be awarded in their divorce
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2006, 09:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto West
Posts: 151
Sk8r is on a distinguished road
Default

Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I believe that if she is receiving support from the father of the children then she cannot also collect support from you.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2006, 02:54 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 816
Grace has a spectacular aura aboutGrace has a spectacular aura about
Default Loco Parentis

Yes, lookingforadvise, you may find yourself paying child support regardless of the bio father paying support. In legal terms it is called Loco Parentis. I believe the courts look at it from the view that if the children have benefited financially from your income i.e. food, shelter, clothing etc. you will be obligated to continue to support them.

I found this article for you:

http://www.edmontonsun.com/News/Colu...0/1347511.html
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2006, 06:38 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 273
Divorcemanagement has a spectacular aura aboutDivorcemanagement has a spectacular aura about
Default Loco Parentis

If you acted in the place of a parent, then get used to the idea of paying child support for a child who is not biologically yours. Of course, you do have the right to obtain regular access to the child/children...
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2006, 03:42 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto West
Posts: 151
Sk8r is on a distinguished road
Default

isn't that like double dipping?

receiving support from the bio father AND the "step" parent?
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2006, 03:47 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 273
Divorcemanagement has a spectacular aura aboutDivorcemanagement has a spectacular aura about
Default double dipping

Yep, in my view it certainly is double dipping. But if a former commonlaw spouse can prove you acted in the place of a parent, you can be required to pay child support for a child who is biologically not yours.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2006, 07:46 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 816
Grace has a spectacular aura aboutGrace has a spectacular aura about
Default Double Dipping

Whether you agree or disagree with this, I believe the reason behind it, in the courts eyes, is that the children enjoyed a higher lifestyle with two Dads (or reversed 2 Mom's) contributing, so when the parents separate the children can still enjoy a somewhat similar lifestyle.

To quote from Decent Dad, Mom gets remarried, kids get an in ground pool
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-24-2006, 11:25 PM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,382
logicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Yahoo to logicalvelocity
Default

lookingforadvise,

If you get served for a claim of child support, be sure to name the other father as a co-respondent to the claim especially if your ex settled for a lower amount other than tabled guideline. Everyone's income changes overtime and it could very well be this individual's income has increased substantially.

Additionally as a subsequent issue, contact is a child's right, and if you desire to maintain a relationship to these children, you could request access in a cross claim. The court's will most likely grant it also.

LV
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2006, 04:43 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1
Linda is on a distinguished road
Default common law question

Hi everyone,

I am new at this forum. I have lived common law less than 3 yrs..would have been 3 yrs in Aug 06. I put down $70,000 on a house and he put down $5000. The understanding was that he would give me back the 70,000 if we ever split. Both names are on the house. I then paid 20,000$ to pay down his line of credit(was only in his name/had nothing to do with me) I guess I am giving in nature and naive. NO longer naive. I have been paying the mortgage by myself(coming out of my own account/not joint) plus paying the bills which is also coming out of my account. He now wants half the profit from the house. It is going to court as he refused my 20,000 payout to him. Is this what you would call unjust enrichment? He also signed a piece of paper saying that after the sale of the house, he would give me back the 70,000. Unfortunately, only his and my signature is on the paper. How do you think a mediator would look at this one. He also cleaned out the garage with items he purchased while we were living together. Sabottaged my boat..took batterie/motor out. What a mess. I would recommend to have prenuptial agreement NO MATTER HOW TRUSTING ONE SEEMS.

need advice

thanks
Linda
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2006, 05:28 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1
mary is on a distinguished road
Post

buying a house in common law relation???
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:00 AM.


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0