Quote:
Originally Posted by dadtotheend
Do you mean that we should cry about how badly men are denied access by vindictive, selfish moms who want to stick it to them even if it means depriving thier children of a relationship with their Dad?
Or do you mean that we should cry for the men living in their cars because they have been bled financially dry by lazy, entitlement driven ex's who see a street lined with someone's money to pay for the bon bons they eat while seated on the couch watching American Idol?
Making such ridiculous stereotypical statements like the one you made above contributes nothing to the discussion. On the contrary it fans the flames and encourages the likeminded stereotypical responses I just posted.
And it makes you look a clown.
|
Well, somebody has a major chip on his shoulder.
Men who aren't involved with their children are well practiced at playing the TIRED, boring "selfish, vindictive mother keeping the poor hard-done by father away from the kiddies" card. Snore. See, Mr. Silly Clown, if women were the monsters you THINK they all are, I guess more children would be in need of intervention.
I would LOVE to have the easy job too many fathers have. Yes, too many, honey, and if you learned to calm down and be rational, you wouldn't be so ready to blame all women for your problems. YOU are the one stereotyping women, honey.
Bon bons? What a joke...............and honey, I couldn't be a clown if I tried. I'm rational, fair and intelligent. See, I'm not one of your family members or friends.
Fathers' rights activists do themselves and their children (whom they profess to care about) no favours when they vindictively go after their exes. Take your obvious women-hating elsewhere, or better yet, get professional help.
I love it when some of the dudes only started caring about the kids when the increases in child-support took effect. But have no fear, boys, just run off to another province, and it makes it SO hard for your exes to get practically anything! (but that doesn't happen, does it?)