View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 12-06-2017, 12:20 AM
arabian's Avatar
arabian arabian is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 9,968
arabian will become famous soon enough

In fairness to the poster, he did state "temporary order on consent" I guess I just don't understand this. He goes on to say that the judge disagreed with what the two opposing parties came up with. That is what I am asking about - what was the judge's reasoning for dismissing what the two opposing parties agreed to "on consent"? The judge went on to make his/her own "temporary order."

Without transcripts (which poster should see if he can obtain) there is not much to go on here. Obviously something troubled the judge.
Reply With Quote