View Single Post
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-03-2017, 11:10 AM
plainNamedDad44's Avatar
plainNamedDad44 plainNamedDad44 is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 796
plainNamedDad44 is on a distinguished road
Default Nailed STBX and her lawyer on tax returns!!


STBX's counsel unsuccessfully argued that C/S should terminate based on STBX's 2016 NOA. I was prepared and showed how most of the expenses (rental income) STBX claimed were false, unsubstantiated, or disallowed.

STBX's counsel reverted to the 2016 NOA in her arguments, to which the Justice noted 'the NOA is a starting point for the consideration of C/S'


DONT ROLE OVER regarding C/S based on an NOA !!!!

Hope this helps someone else.

Reply With Quote