View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-10-2017, 09:30 PM
Stillbreathing Stillbreathing is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 230
Stillbreathing is on a distinguished road

I personally do not have any statistics but they are available from the death review committee report on domestic homicide in Canada.

Three cases that come to mind are: 1. The Quebec cardiologist who stabbed his children to death in the middle of an acrimonious divorce when he got unsupervised access and 2 cases in Oshawa, Ontario ( both case managed by justice Scott).
2. One murder occurred in 1996 where justice Scott granted the father unsupervised access to his son and the father doused the child with gasoline, set him on fire and killed him
3. Another case overseen by justice Scott in 2015 or 2016 in which a father murdered his child as a direct result of her ignoring evidence and ordering unsupervised access. This case did make the papers.

The point is that spouses and children do get murdered during litigation. Women have also murdered their children and spouses.
Domestic homicide does occur before, during and after litigation. It is one of the most predictable and therefor preventable homicides.
Either spouse can use the family court system as a weapon to hurt their spouse, alienate the children or financially ruin the other spouse. Family court allows this to happen by virtue of rare and slow consequences for such behaviour.

Family court takes an already dangerous situation and escalates it even further. Instead of stopping abusive behaviour by a litigant, judges allow it to continue until
the damage is finite. By the time a judge actually imposes consequences for abusive behaviour it's often too late to reverse the damage.
This applies equally to men or women.

Family court litigation is one of the most horrific, painful, life altering and stressful events anyone can go through. Even otherwise rational and sane parents can find it crazy making. The stakes are huge.
Divorce can bring out depression and desperation and hopelessness in even a relatively high functioning person...
... there are warning signs for those cases that risk crossing the line...judges need to be held accountable, to a higher standard than they are now.

Why is nobody lobbying to have justice Scott removed? Two children died as a direct result of her orders...if she were a surgeon, she would have been sued or made to take domestic violence training at the very least.

Domestic violence specialists in doing a mandatory evaluation would be best able to identify those 1 out of 10 high conflict cases that pose a real
Threat of harm or fatality to spouses and children. At the same time they could tease apart false allegations from actual verifiable abuse. They would also be able to identify alienating parental behaviour and suggest remedies for all the above before it's too late.

Last edited by Stillbreathing; 04-10-2017 at 09:43 PM.
Reply With Quote