View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2016, 02:13 AM
Tayken's Avatar
Tayken Tayken is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 6,563
Tayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant futureTayken has a brilliant future
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YOW View Post
lol - yes I prefer women also, but my ex sometimes makes me think completely alone is the best way to be.

I would post here and vent this situation I am dealing with, but I don't trust her at all. I do believe that if she somehow came across it, she would find a way to use it against me.
Hard to do as she would need to undergo a norwich order to get any details from this site. For that to happen the content has to be malicious/slanderous. It is hard to prove who an anonymous user is on the internet. Especially on a message forum. No doubt the owner of this forum would oppose a Norwich order for disclosure and it would take a lot of time and money to possibly get the information. Information which would only lead hopefully to a randomly created email address of no identifiable value. From their they would have to get another Norwich on the email address. Which Google fights tooth and nail. If they get it all they would get is an IP address. From there they would have to then norwich the ISP. Which they fight hard core too. More time, more money.

All for what? Some evidence? That you were getting advice from random nutjobs on the internet?

What you may give up is your arguments and position to the other party. But, could it be used in court against you. No reasonable lawyer would even try. Hell, we have had people admit to their threads, threaten suicide and totally melt down and that stuff doesn't even make it into their cases.

Norwich orders are NO WALK IN THE PARK!

http://www.weirfoulds.com/files/6790...s-Original.pdf
Reply With Quote