In your situation what they told you was true. there is a clause in Family law that states one would have to sue the recipiant to gain overpayments etc. this is also based on the premis that the situation was just brought to light. In my spouses case they were supplied with numerous opportunies and fact with which to respond to and they never said a word except their typical so what attitde. Where our thoughts are and how we want change is that Just like any other agency or individual they need to be held accountable for ther actions. In this case they just went off on a "tangent" and chose to ignore the evidence in front of them. In my mind it makes them liable therefore we hope will over turn the clause that one has to sue the recipiant. Honestly if FRO is determined that they have messed like anyone else they are responsible. Not too many in the past have challenged FRO and well I guess we will be amoung the first. According to our lawyer there are many who are getting fed up and are starting to challenge them. I think it is about time.
|