Yes, that's pretty much true.
When you think about it, that rule is in the children's best interest. If parental disagreement about whether should post-secondary be paid is strong enough to require state intervention, and the best interests of the children is the biggest priority, then the state has to come down on the side of tuition being paid. Is the state going to deny the child a post-secondary education?
The problem comes when unscrupulous CS recipients manipulate that rule just to continue getting child support, especially if there isn't a need.
|