From your post, the dog is registered to the CKC in both names but only to you with the local municipality for licensing for the purpose of local by-laws.
This is a tricky subject, I am a breeder of 15+ years and have dealt with this more often then I care to.
I understand that this can get a messy a dealing with children, NO KIDDING!
When I separated from my husband it was as difficult to deal with the ownership of the dogs as it was hammering out issues with respect to CS and access for the children.
Since the “legally binding” ownership is in both names, you would sincerely have to show that the onus for raising and caring for and paying for the associated costs came from you. And that the primary trainer was you, as some breeds are loyal to one human, maybe two people in “their pack”.
If you can demonstrate this and show she had limited association during your relationship and that the increased interactions were spite driven and not due to sincere passion for the animal, you may have a case to win physical ownership.
I wish you the best, animals cannot speak for themselves, and they cannot get OCL involved to speak for them.
|