View Single Post
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11-18-2013, 01:53 PM
Serene Serene is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,587
Serene is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ByMyself View Post
In your response, using Form 22A, you will address every "fact" line by line, and every piece of evidence, line by line. I assume you have the form in front of you.
There are no facts in this request to admit. Just the emails.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ByMyself View Post
The ones you do not - explain why not, as the form provides a section for this purpose exactly.
I guess we don't necessarily understand how to word our response as to why we can't admit... and we want to be sure we aren't being unreasonable.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ByMyself View Post
Are any of the emails not addressed to you directly, but instead are third party? State you cannot authenticate due to that reason.
Yes, some emails are between the other party and a third party and do not even include us.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ByMyself View Post
The emails that are partially blacked out - does it explain on their request to admit why they are blacked out? If it is because of legal privilege, they are entitled to black it out, but that should be explained in their Request. You can refuse to authenticate because you cannot read the entire content of the email.
No explanation is provided. Just parts of the emails are blacked out. Their forms were poorly completed. Times and dates of emails, and to whom the emails were from and to are not completed accurately or at all. So would we just say "cannot admit, cannot read entire content of email"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ByMyself View Post
Just be careful that you aren't objecting just for the sake of it, and it is regarding something relevant.
I can't even see the relevancy in some of the emails. Nor can I figure out how these could even be useful to the other party's side to be honest.

Quote:
Originally Posted by ByMyself View Post
The emails that have been written on - maybe try saying you will not authenticate because document has improperly had additional evidence added to it that should have been done through affidavit. Insist on an original document.
Good advice!

Quote:
Originally Posted by ByMyself View Post
Do you have unaltered copies of any of these documents? Serve them in your request instead. Mention that in your reply - see line # XX of applicant/respondent's request to admit dated (date XX)
I'd rather not do their work for them. If they want to serve an additional request to admit they can. There is time.


Last question: I note that some of the emails are not the entire thread in their entirety. Meaning, our last response is not included but was definitely available when the request to admit was provided. I believe this was intentional. Anything we could do or add or state in our response with regards to this?

Last edited by Mess; 12-04-2013 at 09:22 AM. Reason: To fix quotes