View Single Post
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-11-2007, 11:11 AM
logicalvelocity logicalvelocity is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario
Posts: 3,881
logicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura aboutlogicalvelocity has a spectacular aura about
Send a message via Yahoo to logicalvelocity
Default

sammysdad,

Welcome to the forum

Generally the big issue in your situation is spousal support.

With that said, it appears that the individual is entitled to bring forth a claim of such due to the facts of your situation.

However, "means and needs" is the decisive factor when a court will award same with first consideration to support of a child.


As you mentioned, the individual is "babysitting" earning a respectable amount in addition to receiving public aid. To me this suggests fraud in itself.

If it was me, I would hire a bonded private investigator who could video tape the evidence of the comings and goings of children to and from the household for a week or two. This demonstrates on the balance of probabilities that
  • they are capable to look after children notwithstanding their claim to the contrary;
  • if they are doing such service, they should be receiving a monetary amount for such, and;
  • the individuals credibility will be in question if the matter is litigated.
Once this evidence is obtained, present in on the other party. Get a feel for their stance at the point. I suspect they may drop their claim rather than risk exposing themselves to be fraudulent.

lv
Reply With Quote